![]() But the timing and the brutality, with the AG literally breathing down their necks, is hardly a coincidence,” Froomkin said. “Sure, the Park Police at some point intended to clear Lafayette Park. This is straight up bullshit.”ĭan Froomkin, editor of, suggested the excuse provided by the Interior Department - that the demonstrators were going to be cleared regardless of the photo op by Trump - seemed convenient to him. “My eyes did not lie to me, and yours did not lie to you. what happened that day I’ve never seen happen at any protest in the District,” Clymer said. Writer and activist Charlotte Clymer, who was at Lafayette Park last summer, said she didn’t believe what Greenblatt had concluded. “Now the Interior Department says that construction crews needed to build a fence. Bush, wrote in a tweet in response to the report. “Bill Barr told Congress that Park Police cleared protesters from Lafayette Park for ‘security reasons,'” Richard Painter, the former chief White House ethics lawyer for former President George W. The inconsistencies in what supposedly justified clearing the park of protesters on June 1, 2020, was another problem identified by critics of the report. “What did the White House team know at the time? did not speak to senior officials or the Secret Service,” Acosta noted. This cannot, and must not, be the last word on one of the most appalling moments of the Trump administration, or any administration for that matter.”ĬNN’s Jim Acosta echoed those sentiments, saying that Greenblatt’s report appeared to him to be an “audition” to “become inspector general at Mar-a-Lago.” Many questions remained about what happened on that day, Acosta added. ![]() Truthout columnist William Rivers Pitt, who had written about the Lafayette Park incident back in June, said: “Clearing peaceful protesters with gas and rubber bullets just to erect a fence, at that specific moment? There are so many holes in this IG report, it should have been printed on Swiss cheese. Hogan Gidley, who served as principal deputy Press Secretary under Trump.īut many journalists are questioning the credibility of the report, pointing to its omissions and inconsistencies. “Another grotesque lie proven false that was breathlessly and irresponsibly pushed by the media,” wrote J. Other Trump allies on social media said the inspector general’s findings were an example of the media making baseless reports about the former president. “Thank you to the Department of the Interior Inspector General for Completely and Totally exonerating me in the clearing of Lafayette Park!” Trump said in a statement. Trump himself thanked his former appointee for crafting the report, saying that it had exonerated him for what had happened. The idea that Barr didn’t issue the order is contradictory, too, to what the Trump White House had told the media in the days after it happened. For starters, while it claimed that Barr didn’t order USPP to attack and disperse demonstrators, it leaves redacted in the report who exactly it was that made the order. ![]() Ī number of individuals on social media have noted that the report is rife with problems and glaring omissions. “Are you freaking kidding me?” that individual reportedly responded. “Are these people still going to be here when POTUS comes out?” Barr asked to a commander of the USPP.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |